David Frankfurter ([info]dfrankfurter) wrote,
@ 2009-07-15 12:26:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
The big Truth
Over the years we have seen Israel on the losing end of an ongoing propaganda war that has increasingly besmirched its image in the media and has increasingly affected the realpolitik of the world in which we live and operate.


The pattern is consistent. The Palestinian lobby starts with a lie which is so unbelievable that we belittle it – or even ignore it. The lie is repeated often enough until the world believes it – and even our natural supporters in the Jewish Diaspora begin to adopt it, repeat it and reinforce it. It then becomes a reality we have to deal with. Eventually even the Israeli government toes the line. Frankly we are fools. And if we ever thought “never again!”, why don’t we fight back?

Let’s understand how it works. The “big lie” was most famously defined by Hitler – in fact in a “big lie” hidden within a “big lie” – he accused the Jews of using the tactic:

“…in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation… would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation. For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying.” —Adolf Hitler , Mein Kampf, vol. I, ch. X


United States Office of Strategic Services wartime description of Hitler’s Psychological Profile showed how he used the tactic:

His primary rules were: never allow the public to cool off; never admit a fault or wrong; never concede that there may be some good in your enemy; never leave room for alternatives; never accept blame; concentrate on one enemy at a time and blame him for everything that goes wrong; people will believe a big lie sooner than a little one; and if you repeat it frequently enough people will sooner or later believe it.”


And the Palestinians adopted Hitler’s ways. Amongst their own public and in the international arena.

Let’s take, as an example, the “illegal” settlements beyond the 1967 armistice line, in what is “rightful Palestinian territory”, that have become in the world’s mind the only “obstacle to peace”. If Israel would only abandon the settlements, the world would support Israel, peace would miraculously descend from heaven resolving the Israeli-Palestinian dispute , magically diffuse over the entire Middle East, and the Messianic era would usher in world peace. Leaving aside whether one thinks that settlements are a good idea, a bad idea, should be dismantled or not, are a blessing or a curse – the fundamental assumptions are simply balderdash.

The Arab world rejected Israel and launched non-stop wars and terrorist campaigns against Israel’s citizens before a single settlement existed beyond the 1967 armistice lines. At least some “post-1967 Settlements” were re-established on Jewish owned lands, where the surrounding Arab neighbours had massacred the inhabitants during one or another of these violent attempts to purge the region of Jews. There are many eminent international lawyers who would contend that the vast majority of the settlements in Judea and Samaria are perfectly acceptable under international law.

Most telling, however, is the experiment which thoroughly tested and disproved the idea that removing settlements or Jews from “Palestine” will somehow magically lead to peace. In September 2005, all the settlements in the Gaza strip were voluntarily abandoned. The Gaza strip was made completely “Judenrein” or Jew-free. We all know the results.

The world “rewarded” Israel by allowing Prime Minister Ariel Sharon
address a near-empty plenum of the UN, and then promptly placed all blame for Palestinian failures on Israeli shoulders. Instead of an opportunity for state-building, the Palestinians chose a path of self-destruction and terrorist war against Israel. Rocket attacks, suicide bombings, and internal violence and corruption didn’t let up for a moment. And the infant Gaza economy was deliberately destroyed from the inside.

But, we are told, Hamas did all of this, and that the Mahmoud Abbas (Abu Mazen) led Palestinian Authority is “different”, “moderate” and “responsible”. Another big lie.

The very same Abbas led Palestinian Authority was in power in Gaza when Israel left. Hamas didn’t come to power until June 2007 – some twenty months later! And Abbas’ Fatah political party, which also controls the Al Aqsa terrorists, has (in Arabic only, of course) consistently agreed with Hamas. Just last week, a
Fatah activist once again declared on PA Television that they don’t want peace. As Fatah strong man Mahmoud Dahlan explained on PA Television in March, the Palestinians will not recognise Israel; any contrary statements are purely designed to obtain international funds and support. Is it any wonder that Abbas refuses Benjamin Netanyahu’s unconditional invitation to meet to discuss peace?

Don’t misunderstand me. I am in favour of anything that has a reasonable chance of bringing peace to our region. But Israel is being pushed to make huge one-sided high-risk concessions, for which it gets little or nothing in return; all on the basis of a web of lies that have been thoroughly disproved, but repeated often enough, loudly enough and from high enough places that the world either pretends to or really does believe.

And this is just one the most recent example of the way the Palestinians and the world have adopted Adolf Hitler’s “big lie” principle to outflank the Jews.

But how to fight back? The only way I can think of is to tell “the big truth”. Start calling out the truth loudly enough, clearly enough, often enough that it begins to stick. Call every bluff in no uncertain terms. Don’t defend. Fight back. But it takes each and every one of us to do it. Loudly. Publicly. Every time.

What truths can we tell? How should we tell them? Please post your ideas and comments at my website for everyone to read.




(23 comments) - (Post a new comment)

How True
(Anonymous)
2009-07-15 10:10 am UTC (link)
The lies have stuck so well that any truth that you tell sounds so incredible that it will work as well as the big lie!

How about starting with the fact that Netanyahu publicly called for Abbas to sit at unconditional peace talks, and Abbas said "no".

(Reply to this)

The big truth
(Anonymous)
2009-07-15 10:27 am UTC (link)
1. Arab attacks on Jews began long before there was a Jewish State - and it was on Jews who were not involved in the Zionist endeavour.
2. Arab attacks on Israel were a constant feature of Israeli life in the 1950's and 1960's - before there were any "settlements" in the West Bank and Gaza.
3. Israel captured the West Bank from the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, which subsequently abandoned all claim that that region. Given that Israel was in possession of that land at the time, Israel became the lawful successor to Jordan in the West Bank (as opposed to some entity calling itself "Palestine").
4. Ditto for the Gaza Strip (replace Jordan with Egypt, but the same applies).

(Reply to this)

I agree
(Anonymous)
2009-07-15 11:04 am UTC (link)
That's the major theme of my entire blog.
http://elderofziyon.blogspot.com

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: I agree
[info]dfrankfurter
2009-07-15 03:26 pm UTC (link)
Yea - but how do we get the message from the blogs to the street?

(Reply to this) (Parent)

The Big Truth
[info]ruvysroost.blogspot.com
2009-07-15 11:18 am UTC (link)
Nice job, David. You gave a reasonably complete job there. For my sake, and for your own, try to avoid the term "Palestinian" when referring to individual Arabs, though - you're buying into their first big lie - that they have a nationality at all.

But as for a positive suggestion beyond that, check out the new organization, Z Street (http://ziostreet.wordpress.com/) and offer them a welcome, and a hand up. It's time for us to build alliances among our own, especially with groups who seem to mean business, and to build trust and strength. We've torn at each other for too long, and the enemies of our enterprise here have benefited too much by it.

Whattya say?

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: The Big Truth
[info]dfrankfurter
2009-07-15 03:28 pm UTC (link)
Let's hope Z street gives some balance to J street!

(Reply to this) (Parent)

1922 and all that
(Anonymous)
2009-07-15 11:23 am UTC (link)
The incorrect (or mendacious) contention and belief that the Jewish communities beyond the "green pre-1967 line"are allegedly "illegal"are a major source of anti-Israel sentiment.
These communities, however, are perfectly legal (not to mention all the other grounds on which they are legitimate.) From its earliest days, the Zionism of the modern era sought to obtain legitimation from the laws of nations. Thus Herzl constantly worked for of "a charter" from the international community to legitimise in international law the aims and objectives of the Zionist movement.

In 1922 this was achieved when the Council of The League of Nations adopted a binding resolution acknowledging the right of the Jewish People to reconstitute its nation-state in The Land of Israel from the Mediterranean Sea to the eastern boundary of what was soon to become the artificial precursor of today's artificial Kingdom of Jordan.
This resolution mandated the occupying Power, Britain, to facilitate the domicile ( "settlement") of Jews in the entire territory, which included, obviously, the whole of Jerusalem.

Subsequently Britain amputated 80% of the Land to create Jordan, but in the remaining 20%, which included Jerusalem, Judea/Samaria (the "West Bank") as well as the Gaza Strip, Jews had a perfectly legal right to "settle", and they did.
Hence the allegation that "the settlements" are 'illegal" is motivated by ignorance, malevolence, disregard for legality or by political expediency. For many in the world the legality of 'the settlements" is an inconvenient truth.

Whether or not The State of Israel benefits from retaining ultimate control over Judea/Samaria is an entirely different debate, but its presence there is not only consistent with legality; it is mandated by it.

(Reply to this)

An inconvenient truth
(Anonymous)
2009-07-15 11:32 am UTC (link)
A slogan is one of the weapons that can be useful in the propaganda struggle. I suggest the following (which I used in my previous, lengthy post) : THE LEGALITY OF THE JEWISH SETTLEMENTS IS AN INCONVENIENT TRUTH FOR THOSE WHO PAY ONLY LIP SERVICE TO LEGALITY, or an abbreviated version of this.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: An inconvenient truth
(Anonymous)
2009-07-15 01:35 pm UTC (link)
Shalom. Your slogan is too long - people won't relate unless it's short & pithy. How about: Settlements illegal? What settlements?
or: Settlements illegal? Who are you kidding?
The idea being to, perhaps, get a response. Just a thought. Good luck.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Re: An inconvenient truth
[info]dfrankfurter
2009-07-15 03:21 pm UTC (link)
Legality of settlements is not the issue. The issue is that settlements are not an obstacle to peace.

Settlements an obstacle to peace? So how come thousands of rockets got fired out of "Judenrein" Gaza.

Write it as a letter to the editor to every newspaper that quotes a politician saying that Israel has to stop te settlements. Ask them why they don't challenge such absurdity. Make the letter VERY short.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

My rebuttal of new book 'Israeli Apartheid'
(Anonymous)
2009-07-15 12:23 pm UTC (link)
http://blog.z-word.com/2009/07/lies-damn-lies-and-the-apartheid-analogy/

(Reply to this)

Been There, Done That
(Anonymous)
2009-07-15 03:05 pm UTC (link)
Many of us have been telling the Big Truth for years. The message has not been getting through. The ones who must keep telling - and repeating - the Big Truth are the ones who have the Big Microphones. Bibi gave a great speech a while back. It didn't get enough publicity. The points need to be repeated, from official circles. We flatter ourselves in the blogosphere if we think that talking to our own community is enough to affect the general consciousness. -Carlos

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Been There, Done That
[info]dfrankfurter
2009-07-15 03:30 pm UTC (link)
We need to become newsmakers. Organise a large enough street demonstration with a simple "big truth" theme & it will get sime attention

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Re: Been There, Done That -- but it is working
(Anonymous)
2009-07-15 04:00 pm UTC (link)
I have also been telling the "big truth" on the Internet for fifteen years now (through the former Tzemach News Service and currently with the Emet News Service (http://emetnews.org/)) and I can say that, in my experience, there are many people getting the message and they are spreading it. The problem is that the media refuses to report it and most people pay attention to the media, regardless of what they say. But that will always be the situation, as well as the world in general refusing to hear the truth. Those who want to know the truth find it; those who don't will never be reached.

I have many articles written by different authors that help to explain much of this with regards to Israel, the 'Palestinians', 'Palestine', and the 'peace' process. You can find them on my site at: http://emetnews.org/analysis/

I have found that the use of newsletters and Twitter to help also. On the ground, there are many people who use these types of materials to prove to others, and from the feedback I have received, it's been effective for those wanting to hear the truth.

As to what to tell them, there have been many excellent examples listed above. The articles on my site explain it also. I don't use the term 'Palestinian' unless it's in a quote and then I mark it with [sic]. I use the term 'Arabs', because that is what they are. As for the 'Palestinian Authority', I abbreviate it 'PA/PLO', as that helps to point out that it's run by the PLO. I also don't generally use the term illegal outposts, or, if I do, I place it in quotes. I also use the term 'communities' many times in place of 'settlements'. And never use the terms 'insurgents' or 'guerrillas' or 'militants' for Arab terrorists. Just call them 'terrorists', as that is what they are. When speaking of the refugee camps, always place refugee in quotes, i.e., 'refugee', because they are not really refugees.

The bottom line is to keep these messages coming forth and sharing them on other Web sites to help spread them further.

As to Netanyahu's recent speech, it wasn't great in that it called for an Arab state carved out of Judea and Samaria. While Netanyahu said it must be demilitarized, he knows that's not going to happen. The US has been training the PA/PLO military for three years now and they will not throw that away. Israel's only answer is for the actual citizens to stand up and take the lead, as did the Maccabees.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Re: Been There, Done That
(Anonymous)
2009-07-15 05:39 pm UTC (link)
Every once in a while, someone from outside the Jewish community, from outside the circle of committed Zionists, darts out in front -- like Lance Armstrong breaking away from the peloton -- with a statement that is so clear, admirable and courageous that it's almost embarrassing to the rest of us. One recent example was the statement on the floor of the Senate on June 16, on his own initiative, by New Jersey Sen. Robert Menendez. In one fell swoop, he established his credentials as a leader on the issue of Israel's existence and security.

This comment is not meant as a political paean to Sen. Menendez. Rather, it is a wake-up call to recognize and exploit the efforts by those willing to take such initiative. It reminds me of a comment many years ago, at a JCRC breakfast in NYC, about a particular senator, a great supporter of Israel with a tiny Jewish constituency, who was being honored. He had received some heavy lobby opposition to a pro-Israel measure, and he got on the phone to Jewish leaders to urge their members to communicate with him, to give him cover for supporting the measure.

We ought to be citing and quoting from the Menendez statement, and boosting him as a true leader on this issue, much as Scoop Jackson was on the issue of Soviet Jewry. Hopefully, that will encourage (i.e., give courage to) other legislators and political leaders to join a groundswell of support for telling the truth about Israel.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Your letters
(Anonymous)
2009-07-15 04:50 pm UTC (link)
Hi David, Just to say I love reading your letters.....always did was so glad you started up again. You always talk sense but I worry that we are all talking to the convinced we need to find a way to get the "big truth" to the disbelievers.
Keep up the good work.

(Reply to this)

From Jean
(Anonymous)
2009-07-15 07:50 pm UTC (link)
I am all for demos and would gladly take part but WHERE are they?!!!! I also really believe in eye ball to eye ball contact with people. the press , politicians , Red Cross, Clergy. It is a different ball game when people are sitting together

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: From Jean
(Anonymous)
2009-07-15 09:25 pm UTC (link)
In my experience the politicians will only pretend to listen, the press doesn't really care, the Red Cross has better things to do, and many of the clergy I have seen are really doing it for self-promotion.

I have never seen demonstrations in regards to Israel here in the US bear much fruit. John Hagee has held several in Washington, D.C. and they get a few thousand people, the politicians show up for the press (which generally don't give it much coverage) and everyone goes home. And as far as informing anyone, the speeches, etc. are delivered to people who generally already know these things.

It doesn't matter if you contact the politicians here in the US. They can't do anything in Israel. It's the Israeli leaders who must stand up to the other nations.

The general public usually doesn't pay attention to these types of marches. They see them as they drive by, that's about it. The people attending already know this stuff.

As far as informing people, it's best done through Web sites, letters to the editor, etc. and that is the main thing -- informing people. Write articles for blogs. There are many Web sites that will publish guest bloggers. Posting on forums and adding comments to stories helps also. It's the "informing" and "educating" that needs to be done, not another demonstration. That was the original topic here, correct?

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: From Jean
[info]dfrankfurter
2009-07-16 01:30 am UTC (link)
I think that part of the problem with demonstrations is that the messages are bland and do not tell the big truth. They don't capture media attention because they are not worthy of it. Why is there no demonstrations challenging the US view of settlements? "Settlements block peace? Judenrein Gaza didn't bring peace!" - "Obama - why let Abbas say "no" to negotiations?"
These may not be the exact slogans, but the slogans need to be controversial truth.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

The Big Truth
(Anonymous)
2009-07-16 06:14 am UTC (link)
Some of us have for years been contradicting the lies in various chat programs on the internet. This has helped to a limited extent with regard to those that do visit the same virtual rooms that we are in.
Our enemies and their worldwide supporters outnumber us as you know so our efforts are a drop in the ocean but we still continue.
The masses that are not connected to the web will never hear anything that their respective governments don't want them to hear. this happens not only in our area but also in Europe as well and to a lesser extent in the USA.
The only way is to bring to light the agenda of the religion that drives our enemies to the press of the world that the leaders of those islamic countries so efficiently miss use.
This agenda is being implemented in European countries today more and more but the insanity is that this is not being published.
I think that ideas have to be formed as to how to accomplish this but unfortunately I personally have no idea as to how. Sorry.
Best regards to all
Ely
Rehovot, Israel

(Reply to this)

Big Lies
[info]bostonwalks
2009-07-19 02:53 pm UTC (link)
Your commentary is powerful David! Obviously, there is no easy way to preclude big lies. Of course, if one could identify an American perpertrator of a big lie and successfully accuse and proscecute such a perp through our courts, it's possible that the US Supreme Court might find such a deliberate lie equivalent to shouting fire in a theater (or some other basis for it being heinous). For my part, I've written creative web pages condemning the world's listening and taking seriously such big lies. For example, see my acrostic poem on antisemitism at http://www.gis.net/bostonwalks/antisemite.html
Thanks,
Michael A. Ross
bostonwalks@hotmail.com

(Reply to this)

Conflict ?
(Anonymous)
2009-07-20 10:18 pm UTC (link)
The success of World War II was the unconditional surrender !
At this moment the US is trying to wipe out the Tali-ban in Afghanistan, but all Israeli-Arab wars so far were stopped in their tracks....

You can figure it out yourself!

(Reply to this)

Big Truth
[info]charlior
2009-07-23 09:11 am UTC (link)
One Big Truth that can be understood is that it is an insult to reader's intelligence to claim that 6 m Israelis are a threat to 1,500 m Muslims.

(Reply to this)


(23 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…